My brain, online.
- Consciousness as Unscientific Because it Cannot be Defined
- Aristotle
- Consciousness
- Consciousness as a non-Entity
- A Critical Examination of the Objectivist Metaphysic
- The Levels of Consciousness
- Psychological Inertia
- Primacy of the Personal Consciousness
- AS
- The Error of Conflating the Man-Made with the Metaphysically Given
- The Error in Regarding the Man-Made as Immutable
- Definition
- Bundled Philosophy
- The Mind-Body Conflict
- Empiricism
- The Primacy of Consciousness as the Fundamental Error
- Arguments from Defining God into Existence
- Consciousness as Naturalistic
- Epistemic Units as Objective
- Concept-Formation as an Algebraic Process
- Skinner
- Scientism
- Validation
- The Invalidity of the Senses Implies The Invalidity of Knowledge
- The Error in Regarding the Metaphysically Given as Mutable
- Omnipotence
- Economics
- Entity
- The Interrelation of Evasion and Drift
- Nominalism
- Differentiation
- A Physical Explanation for Consciousness or Free Will does not Negate Their Existence
- The Attack on the Senses by Being Effects
- The Stolen Concept Fallacy
- The Epistemic Primacy of Sense Perception
- Sensualism
- The Objectivist Theory of Concept Formation as Valid
- The Senses as Condensing Complex Information
- Epistemology as Dependent Upon the Fallibility of a Conceptual Consciousness
- The Primacy of Existence vs The Primacy of Consciousness
- Abstraction
- All Knowledge is Either Perceptual or Conceptual
- Axioms as Undeniable
- Conscious Content
- The Error of Conflating the Potential with the Actual
- The Characteristics of Entities
- Conscious Action
- Omniscience
- Commensurability
- Axioms as Irreducible Primaries
- Ayn Rand
- Common Bromides
- The Timaeus on the Imperfection of Reality
- A Consciousness Conscious Only of Itself
- VOS
- The Conflation of Empiricism and Nominalism-Sensualism
- Conceptual Common Denominator
- Concept
- Argumentative Soundness
- Spiritual vs Material
- Nominalism iff Sensualism
- Forms of the Primacy of Consciousness
- Magnum Opus
- Examples of Entities
- Evasion
- Metaphysics
- Measurement
- Percept
- The Categories of Being
- Argumentative Validity
- Focus as Antecedent to Any Choice
- Epistemology as Dependent Upon the Primacy of Existence
- The Grand Canyon Argument
- The Impossibility of Unlimited Senses
- The Senses Do Not Distort
- OPAR
- Concepts of Consciousness as Involving Measurement-Omission
- The Sensory-Perceptual Level as Automatic
- The Locus of Human Free Will
- The Determinist-Indeterminist False-Dichotomy
- The Economic Calculation Problem
- The Kantian Attack on Cognition
- Is Free Will Magic
- A Physical Description of Entities does not Negate Their Existence
- God as a Pure Self-Consciousness
- Austrian Economics
- Existence is Identity
- The Pre-Requisites of Epistemology
- The Validation of Sense Perception
- Different Forms of Sense Perception does not Invalidate Sense Perception
- God as the Designer
- The Axiom of Consciousness
- Innate Ideas
- Objectivism does not Hold that Consciousness is an Entity
- The Primary Choice Being Focus or Drift
- The Error of Mechanistic Causality
- FH
- Mystics of Spirit
- The Fundamental Axioms of Metaphysics
- The Attack on the Senses from their Limitation
I have a goal.
I want to integrate the entirety of philosophy. There already exists various wikis and knowledge-bases online which cover different areas to different degrees of accuracy: I want to beat them all. My plan to do this is to break down every topic into atomic notes, which can then be used as building blocks towards further conclusions which are themselves building blocks.
Previous treatises on philosophy–however good they may be–suffer from the fact that the information in them is all locked-away in massive (often non-digital) tomes, that cannot be easily queried. This site will fix this problem. There can exist notes on this site that contain only a single syllogism, where each premise–rather than being in plaintext–is itself a link to a previous note, and this previous note links to still prior notes until one may break down any argument into its most basic building blocks—its atoms.
To illustrate this with a concrete example, consider Objectivism and Austrianism. Both are heterodox schools of thought, and both get their respective domains correct, but little work has been done to integrate the two. Objectivists are correct about Metaphysics and Epistemology, but they suffer when it comes to the more remote derivations from these core areas in law. But law is precisely one of those areas that the Austrians excel at—these two schools complement each other perfectly, and require complete integration.
That is where this site comes in: with atomic notes on the entire body of philosophy it would be trivial to work ones way back from various remote conclusions in economics straight to the heart of metaphysics. It would be easy to demonstrate which conclusions are consistent with the foundation, and which ones need more work.
Consider supporting this mission:
Due to the nature of this project in particular, I will be keeping every single note entirely open and free for use by the public in any way they see fit. Because of this there can be no paywalls on this site, but I have also various courses available that you are able to purchase for whatever price you see fit, if you think the information here is up-to-scratch and you want to see it integrated into some particular subject matter. If you are not interested in those courses, you can also support me directly at my Ko-Fi site, if you wish to support this mission and see it succeed.
Downloading this knowledge-base
If you do not wish to use this website for interacting with my brain, you can download it here, the entire content of this site is stored on an Obsidian vault, that you can run locally.