My brain, online.
- Concepts of Consciousness as Involving Measurement-Omission
- Aristotle
- Empiricism
- A Physical Description of Entities does not Negate Their Existence
- AS
- OPAR
- The Impossibility of Unlimited Senses
- The Law of Identity
- The Metaphysically Given as Absolute
- The Kantian Attack on Cognition
- The Senses Do Not Distort
- Consciousness as a non-Entity
- A Critical Examination of the Objectivist Metaphysic
- Omniscience
- The Law of Causality
- Conceptual Order
- The Requirements of a Standard of Measurement
- A Physical Description of Entities does not Negate The Metaphysical Status of Sensory Qualities
- The Objectivist Theory of Concept Formation as Valid
- Sensory Subjectivism
- The Impossibility of Gaining Omniscence
- Conceptual Common Denominator
- Nominalism
- The Error of Mechanistic Causality
- Philosophy
- Attempted Refutations of The Law of Causality
- Concept
- Abstraction
- Conscious Action
- The Mind-Body Conflict
- Argumentative Soundness
- The Pre-Requisites of Epistemology
- Epistemic Authoritarianism
- The Primacy of Existence as an Objectivist Innovation
- Entity
- Consciousness as Naturalistic
- The Epistemic Role of Measurement
- Primacy of the Social Consciousness
- Different Forms of Sense Perception Lead to Different Capabilities in Deducing Laws
- Conscious Content
- Objectivism
- The Meaning of Objectivity
- Arguments from Defining God into Existence
- Austrian Economics
- Rejections of the Basic Axioms
- Psychological Inertia
- Argumentative Validity
- The Metaphysical Status of Concepts
- The Error of Conflating the Man-Made with the Metaphysically Given
- Bundled Philosophy
- Skyscrapers as the True Dimensions of Man
- Objectivism does not Hold that Consciousness is an Entity
- Ayn Rand
- Sense Perception
- Spiritual vs Material
- The Validation of Free Will
- The Role of Definition for a Conceptual Being
- Consciousness
- The Error in Regarding the Man-Made as Immutable
- Economics
- The Differing Challenges of Explicating a Standard of Measurement
- Sensation
- Concept-Formation as an Algebraic Process
- Definition
- The Axiom of Consciousness
- Primacy of the Supernatural Consciousness
- All Knowledge is Either Perceptual or Conceptual
- Axioms as Undeniable
- Scientism
- The Fundamental Axioms of Metaphysics
- The Secondary Choice Being The Choice to Think or Evade
- Different Forms of Sense Perception does not Invalidate Sense Perception
- Wikipedians
- Democritus
- Epistemology as Dependent Upon the Primacy of Existence
- A Baby-in-a-Womb as an Entity
- The Categories of Being
- A Physical Explanation for Consciousness or Free Will does not Negate Their Existence
- A Consciousness Conscious Only of Itself
- The Validation of Sense Perception
- The Attack on the Senses by Eddington's Two Tables
- The Communist Manifesto
- Percept
- The Stolen Concept Fallacy
- A Physical Description of Entities is the Realm of Physics, not Philosophy
- The Timaeus on the Imperfection of Reality
- The Epistemic Primacy of Sense Perception
- PWNI
- Commensurability
- The Primacy of Consciousness as the Fundamental Error
- Corollary
- Consciousness as Unscientific Because it Cannot be Defined
- Companions in Guilt
- Rationalism
- Vim Cheatsheet
- The Metaphysical Sense of Objectivity
- The Role of Language for a Conceptual Being
- Mysticism as Invalid
- Differentiation
- The Senses as Condensing Complex Information
I have a goal.
I want to integrate the entirety of philosophy. There already exists various wikis and knowledge-bases online which cover different areas to different degrees of accuracy: I want to beat them all. My plan to do this is to break down every topic into atomic notes, which can then be used as building blocks towards further conclusions which are themselves building blocks.
Previous treatises on philosophy–however good they may be–suffer from the fact that the information in them is all locked-away in massive (often non-digital) tomes, that cannot be easily queried. This site will fix this problem. There can exist notes on this site that contain only a single syllogism, where each premise–rather than being in plaintext–is itself a link to a previous note, and this previous note links to still prior notes until one may break down any argument into its most basic building blocks—its atoms.
To illustrate this with a concrete example, consider Objectivism and Austrianism. Both are heterodox schools of thought, and both get their respective domains correct, but little work has been done to integrate the two. Objectivists are correct about Metaphysics and Epistemology, but they suffer when it comes to the more remote derivations from these core areas in law. But law is precisely one of those areas that the Austrians excel at—these two schools complement each other perfectly, and require complete integration.
That is where this site comes in: with atomic notes on the entire body of philosophy it would be trivial to work ones way back from various remote conclusions in economics straight to the heart of metaphysics. It would be easy to demonstrate which conclusions are consistent with the foundation, and which ones need more work.
Consider supporting this mission:
Due to the nature of this project in particular, I will be keeping every single note entirely open and free for use by the public in any way they see fit. Because of this there can be no paywalls on this site, but I have also various courses available that you are able to purchase for whatever price you see fit, if you think the information here is up-to-scratch and you want to see it integrated into some particular subject matter. If you are not interested in those courses, you can also support me directly at my Ko-Fi site, if you wish to support this mission and see it succeed.
Downloading this knowledge-base
If you do not wish to use this website for interacting with my brain, you can download it here, the entire content of this site is stored on an Obsidian vault, that you can run locally.