My brain, online.
- Mysticism as Invalid
- A Physical Explanation for Consciousness or Free Will does not Negate Their Existence
- The Law of Identity
- Integration
- Aristotle
- Idealism as a Rejection of the Basic Axioms
- The Metaphysical Status of Concepts
- Wikipedians
- Protagoras
- Philosophy
- Sensory Subjectivism
- Nominalism
- Skyscrapers as the True Dimensions of Man
- Entity
- Floating Abstraction
- Focus as Antecedent to Any Choice
- The Requirements of a Standard of Measurement
- Conscious Content
- Is Free Will Magic
- Conscious Action
- The Fundamental Axioms of Metaphysics
- The Metaphysical Status of Sensory Qualities
- Naive Anarchism as a Package Deal
- Psychological Inertia
- Consciousness as Naturalistic
- Does Omnipotence Include The Ability to make Contradictions True
- Different Forms of Sense Perception Lead to Different Capabilities in Deducing Laws
- The Differing Challenges of Explicating a Standard of Measurement
- The Economic Calculation Problem
- Metaphysics
- The Epistemic Primacy of Sense Perception
- Consciousness
- The Stolen Concept Fallacy
- Primacy of the Supernatural Consciousness
- OPAR
- Validation
- Vim Cheatsheet
- The Kantian Attack on Cognition
- Plato
- Common Bromides
- Conceptual Common Denominator
- Arguments from Defining God into Existence
- Metaphysically Given
- The Primacy of Consciousness as the Fundamental Error
- The Error of Conflating the Potential with the Actual
- The Characteristics of Entities
- Objectivism
- The Conflation of Empiricism and Nominalism-Sensualism
- Sense Perception
- A Physical Description of Entities does not Negate Their Existence
- The Impossibility of Unlimited Senses
- Infinity as a Floating Abstraction
- Consciousness as a non-Entity
- How Much Time Has There Been
- Materialism as a Rejection of the Basic Axioms
- Ayn Rand
- Free Will
- Evasion
- Miracles are a Metaphysical Impossibility
- The Metaphysically Given as Absolute
- Epistemology
- The Primary Choice Being Focus or Drift
- Marx
- Argumentative Validity
- A Baby-in-a-Womb as an Entity
- The Sensory-Perceptual Level as Automatic
- Axioms as Undeniable
- Axioms as Irreducible Primaries
- The Locus of Human Free Will
- A Physical Description of Entities is the Realm of Physics, not Philosophy
- The Pre-Requisites of Epistemology
- Timaeus
- Primacy of the Social Consciousness
- Epistemology as Dependent Upon the Fallibility of a Conceptual Consciousness
- The Error of Mechanistic Causality
- Mental Focus
- Austrian Economics
- Existence Exists
- Unit (Epistemology)
- The Attack on the Senses by Being Effects
- FH
- PWNI
- The Levels of Consciousness
- Differentiation
- The Secondary Choice Being The Choice to Think or Evade
- Concept-Formation as an Algebraic Process
- Existence is Identity
- Illusions are not Perceptual Errors
- Skinner
- The Role of Language for a Conceptual Being
- Libertarian Free Will
- The Metaphysical Sense of Objectivity
- Epistemic Units as Objective
- The Grand Canyon Argument
- God as a Rejection of the Basic Axioms
- Companions in Guilt
- Objectivism does not Hold that Consciousness is an Entity
- Hobbes
- Argumentative Soundness
- Mysticism
I have a goal.
I want to integrate the entirety of philosophy. There already exists various wikis and knowledge-bases online which cover different areas to different degrees of accuracy: I want to beat them all. My plan to do this is to break down every topic into atomic notes, which can then be used as building blocks towards further conclusions which are themselves building blocks.
Previous treatises on philosophy–however good they may be–suffer from the fact that the information in them is all locked-away in massive (often non-digital) tomes, that cannot be easily queried. This site will fix this problem. There can exist notes on this site that contain only a single syllogism, where each premise–rather than being in plaintext–is itself a link to a previous note, and this previous note links to still prior notes until one may break down any argument into its most basic building blocks—its atoms.
To illustrate this with a concrete example, consider Objectivism and Austrianism. Both are heterodox schools of thought, and both get their respective domains correct, but little work has been done to integrate the two. Objectivists are correct about Metaphysics and Epistemology, but they suffer when it comes to the more remote derivations from these core areas in law. But law is precisely one of those areas that the Austrians excel at—these two schools complement each other perfectly, and require complete integration.
That is where this site comes in: with atomic notes on the entire body of philosophy it would be trivial to work ones way back from various remote conclusions in economics straight to the heart of metaphysics. It would be easy to demonstrate which conclusions are consistent with the foundation, and which ones need more work.
Consider supporting this mission:
Due to the nature of this project in particular, I will be keeping every single note entirely open and free for use by the public in any way they see fit. Because of this there can be no paywalls on this site, but I have also various courses available that you are able to purchase for whatever price you see fit, if you think the information here is up-to-scratch and you want to see it integrated into some particular subject matter. If you are not interested in those courses, you can also support me directly at my Ko-Fi site, if you wish to support this mission and see it succeed.
Downloading this knowledge-base
If you do not wish to use this website for interacting with my brain, you can download it here, the entire content of this site is stored on an Obsidian vault, that you can run locally.